NIGEL BEALE NOTA BENE BOOKS

Musings on the Book, Literature, Poetry, Literary Criticism, Collecting, Media, Life and the Arts, and Audio Interviews from The Biblio File radio program pertaining to same by a writer, broadcaster, bibliophile.
download adobe acrobat reader 6.02 Download Adobe InCopy CS5 for Mac OEM - Top Software 4 Download adobe acrobat reader printing problems adobe acrobat conference Download Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 OEM - Top Software 4 Download install adobe creative suite photoshop system acrobat adobe approval Download Adobe InCopy CS5 OEM - Top Software 4 Download adobe acrobat viewer free download adobe acrobat 4.5 Download Adobe Soundbooth CS5 OEM - Top Software 4 Download adobe acrobat 7.0 trial air education pdf acrobat adobe training Download Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection OEM - Top Software 4 Download adobe acrobat for windows me adobe creative suite 2 premium software Download Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended OEM - Top Software 4 Download adobe acrobat version 7 upgrade

Archive for December, 2007

December 24th, 2007 • Posted in Wicked Quotes

Where’s Rilke? How come Marx is so slim?


Photo of ‘Modern Book Printing", fourth sculpture (from six) of the Berliner Walk of Ideas on the occasion of 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany. Unveiling: 21 April 2006 at Bebelplatz, square near the Unter den Linden in front of Humboldt University, commemorating Johannes Gutenberg, the inventor of Modern Book Printing around 1450 in Mainz

"Philosophers ruin language, poets ruin logic, but with human reasoning alone man will never make it through life." Schiller

"Literary works cannot be taken over like factories, or literary forms of expression like industrial methods. Realist writing, of which history offers many widely varying examples, is likewise conditioned by the question of how, when and for what class it is made use of." Brecht

He who possesses art and science has religion; he who does not possess them, needs religion." Goethe

"I love those who yearn for the impossible." Goethe

"This is the true measure of love: When we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will ever love in the same way after us" Goethe

"Who loves not wine, women and song, Remains a fool his whole life long"Luther

"Peace if possible, truth at all costs." Luther

"Whatever your heart clings to and confides in, that is really your God" Luther

"If you are not allowed to laugh in heaven, I don’t want to go there" Luther

A child…never takes time off as a child; time off does not begin until the principles of order have been accepted. Boll

"A writer is somebody for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people." Mann

"What could I say to you that would be of value, except that perhaps you seek too much, that as a result of your seeking you cannot find." Hesse

"Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play." Kant

" Happiness, it seems to me, consists of two things: first, in being where you belong, and second — and best — in comfortably going through everyday life, that is, having had a good night’s sleep and not being hurt by new shoes." Fontane

"Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely stupid." Heine

"Whenever there has been talk of exterminating rats, others, who were not rats, have been exterminated." Grass

I saw a deaf man, a blind man, a dumb man, and a lame man catch a hare. The deaf man heard it coming, the blind man spotted it, the dumb man shouted, "There it goes!" and the lame man ran and caught it by the collar." 
Brothers Grimm

“He who doesn’t lose his wits over certain things has no wits to lose” Lessing

“Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it.” Arendt

"About this man Weidel," said the French hotel proprietress, a few days
after the Nazis entered Paris. "He came in, trembling. … He didn’t
want to register. . . . Next morning … he was lying fully dressed on
the bed; a little glass bottle stood on the night table, empty. . . .
We predated . . . Mr. Weidel’s name on the register. . . . Then he was
buried. . . . What am I to do with [his suitcase]?" Seghers

“Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand” Marx

December 23rd, 2007 • Posted in James Wood

James Wood and Zadie Smith:Tell me how it felt, how it really really felt

This is hysterical, old news, but, again, like the posts on Dale Peck, useful background for those out of the know, who want to be in it.

From the tail end of James Wood’s Guardian piece October 6, 2001: Tell me how does it feel? US novelists must now abandon social and theoretical glitter

"The other casualty of recent events [9/11]may well be – it is to be hoped – what I have called "hysterical realism". Hysterical realism is not exactly magical realism, but magical realism’s next stop. It is characterised by a fear of silence. This kind of realism is a perpetual motion machine that appears to have been embarrassed into velocity. Stories and sub-stories sprout on every page. There is a pursuit of vitality at all costs. Recent novels by Rushdie, Pynchon, DeLillo, Foster Wallace, Zadie Smith and others have featured a great rock musician who played air guitar in his crib (Rushdie); a talking dog, a mechanical duck and a giant octagonal cheese (Pynchon); a nun obsessed with germs who may be a reincarnation of J Edgar Hoover (DeLillo); a terrorist group devoted to the liberation of Quebec who move around in wheelchairs (Foster Wallace); and a terrorist Islamic group based in North London with the silly acronym Kevin (Smith).

< Rushdie was at it again in his most recent book, Fury, a lamentable novel that combined hysterical realism – dolls, puppets, allegories, a coup on a Fiji-like island, rampant and tiresome caricature, and a noisy, clumsy prose – with the more traditional social novel. Alas, the social-novel part of the book was set in Manhattan, and offered a kind of diary of last year’s Manhattan events. We encountered Rudy and Hillary, J-Lo, the Puerto Rican parade, Bush versus Gore, the film Gladiator and so on. Of course, the book was already obsolete when it appeared in early September, just before the terrorist attack. Its trivia-tattoo had already faded. But now it seems grotesque, a time-stamped scrap of paper.

It ought to be harder, now, either to bounce around in the false zaniness of hysterical realism or to trudge along in the easy fidelity of social realism. Both genres look a little busted. That may allow a space for the aesthetic, for the contemplative, for novels that tell us not "how the world works" but "how somebody felt about something" – indeed, how a lot of different people felt about a lot of different things (these are commonly called novels about human beings). A space may now open, one hopes, for the kind of novel that shows us that human consciousness is the truest Stendhalian mirror, reflecting helplessly the newly dark lights of the age."

Here is Zadie Smith’s response in the Guardian entitled: This is how it feels to me: Last week James Wood blasted modern fiction, calling for a return to feeling from self-conscious cleverness in the wake of the terrorist attacks...wherein first she agrees with Wood that these are hysterical times, and any novel that aims at hysteria will now be ‘ effortlessly outstripped;’ then, praising Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich, she says:

"But how does it work? I want to dismantle it as if it were a clock, as if it had parts, mechanisms. I wonder if Wood will take that question, then, as a replacement for my earlier one. Not: how does this world work? But: how is this book made? How can I do this?" 

Then, after putting Wood in bed with Oprah, and accusing them of using old soulful arguments against sophistry, she asks:

"Be more human? I sit in front of my white screen and I’m not sure what to do with that one. Are jokes inhuman? Are footnotes? Long words? Technical terms? Intellectual allusions? If I put some kids in, will that help? I want to defend the future possibility of some words appearing on pages that will be equal to these times and to what I feel and what you feel and what James Wood feels; that is, this fear that has got us all by the throat. He argues against silence and against intellectual obfuscation. He says: tell us how it feels. Well, we are trying. I am trying."

Finally, after applauding a deep sheaf of youngish Americans – Franzen, Moody, Foster Wallace, Eggers, Moore – and Brits – Toby Litt, Lawrence Norfolk, Diran Adebayo, Tibor Fischer -for their triumphant soulfulness and humanness, she says: "If I could choose one story to be printed alongside this article as demonstration, it would be Foster Wallace’s "Forever Overhead."

No exegesis, no reasoned argument refuting Wood’s criticism. Just, if you don’t like it then tell me what you’d do, and, you’re wrong, these guys are great, here, read this.

Wood echoes Peter Ackroyd, I think, who wrote in The Listener in 1981: "Some of the more recent American novels…seem to me to be hollow, written at a forced pace, preoccupied with literary special effects, and unable to deal with human beings in other than generalized and stereotypical terms…It is too dazzled by such things [contemporary technology] to allow much space in its language for the workings of human agency. It is a language of power, one in which reality is seen as a phenomenon which can be easily manipulated and controlled…American novelists who live within this language, and whose perceptions are determined by it, are uniquely ill-equipped to deal with human motives and responses, and as a result they are also unable to present any convincing account of their own human society.

December 23rd, 2007 • Posted in James Wood

Waxing on Wood, James and Woolf, Virginia

Virginia Woolf chastises Charles Dickens for making his books "blaze up, not by tightening the plot or sharpening the wit, but by throwing another handful of people upon the fire." This quote is found here in Elisabeth Harvor’s wise, punctilious review of James Wood’s The Broken Estate (and Harold Brodkey’s Sea Battles on Dry Land, burdened with parenthesis because most of the review deals with Wood. Commentary on the two is wedged together, rough hewn, with Brodkey at bookends. Philip Roth shows up at the tail to unite them:" In fact, the final words of…Sabbath’s Theatre, the words Mickey Sabbath speaks when he tries to kill himself but then can’t quite bring himself to commit the final act, could easily have been spoken by either Brodkey or Wood: "How can I leave? Everything I hate is here.").

Here Harvor catches and excuses Wood for repeating himself:


"Although Wood is a very young critic–many of these essays were written when he was still in his twenties–it’s easy to picture him (in an academic gown and being forgetful) as he tells his student audience that he suspects that Jane Austen "went through life as if she were the possessor of a clandestine happiness." But not long after this he says of Chekhov that he "has the air of being the sole possessor of a clandestine happiness". Later still he points out that Thomas Pynchon’s novels have the "agitated density of a prison". And even later he tells us that "only an annulling wash of contradictory adjectives can approach the agitated density of W.G. Sebald’s writing."

Still one is inclined to forgive him his repetitions and memory lapses: he makes his candid judgements so memorable by his use of metaphors. It’s also easy to picture him polishing these metaphors, then walking backwards to admire them: Thomas Mann "building his contraption of truth"; "the slow cortege" of T. S. Eliot’s lines in The Waste Land.

Fun to locate Elizabeth out there in cyberspace, could be anywhere, but no, she lives right here.

 Speaking of Wood, I’m reading Edmund Wilson on Dickens and damned if James doesn’t sound a lot like Edmund. Here’s the latter on G.K. Chesterton, whose writing on Dickens and elsewhere "…is always melting away into that pseudo-poetic booziness which verbalizes with large conceptions and ignores the most obtrusive actualities. " Instead of "agitated density," Wilson uses "nervous concentration," in describing the vivid colours of Edwin Drood,

"which make upon us an impression more disturbing than the dustiness, the weariness, the dreariness, which set the tone for Our Mutual Friend. In this new novel, which is to be his last, Dickens has found a new intensity. The descriptions of Cloisterham are among the best written in all his fiction: they have a nervous concentration and economy – nervous in the old fashioned sense – that produces a rather different effect from anything one remembers in the work of his previous phases. "

December 23rd, 2007 • Posted in On the Arts

The Writer’s Brush: The Exhibition. The Book.

 

 Gunter Grass

 

If you’re in Boston Dec.23-Jan 15, 2008. If not, there’s always the book.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Writer’s Brush

An Exhibition of Art by Writers

15 December 2007 through 15 January 2007

Opening Reception 15 December 6-10 (or longer if we can stand it):

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

We are pleased (nigh unto delighted) to announce our next exhibition, a monumental show of visual art by writers, mounted in conjunction with the publication of the wonderful new book on the subject, entitled The Writer’s Brush, by Donald Friedman, with supplementary essays by John Updike and William Gass (see the wonderful review in this week’s New York Times Book Review). 

The first leg of the show took place in New York in September and October at Anita Shapolsky Gallery, and our show is an expanded (and I hope improved) version of that event.  It will run from the 15th of December through the 15th of January, with an opening reception on 15 December, at which Mr. Friedman and some of the writer/artists will be present and happy to sign or inscribe books.  The show will go to Los Angeles from mid-February through mid-April at Denenberg Fine Arts (with a reception during the Los Angeles Antiquarian Book Fair), and perhaps then on to Houston.  It will contain work by more than 120 writers, including

Walter Abish, Rafael Alberti, Roberta Allen, A.R. Ammons, John Ashbery, Enid Bagnold, Amiri Baraka, Djuna Barnes, Mary Beach, Andrei Bely, Bill Berkson, Ted Berrigan, Elizabeth Bishop, Star Black, Jorge Louis Borges, Breyten Breytenbach, Joseph Brodsky, Charles Bukowski, Gelett Burgess, David Burliuk, William Burroughs, Josef Capek, R.V. Cassill, G.K. Chesterton, Tom Clark, Daniel Clowes, Jean Cocteau, Norma Cole, Douglas Coupland, Morris Cox, Jim Crace, E.E. Cummings, Annie Dillard, J.P. Donleavy, John Dos Passos, Rikki Ducornet, Robert Duncan, Lawrence Durrell, Russell Edson, David Eggers, Kenward Elmslie, Mary Fabelli, Jules Feiffer, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Jacopo Fijman, Charles Henri Ford, Federico Garcia Lorca, Kahlil Gibran, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Allen Ginsberg, Louise Gluck, Guenter Grass, Alasdair Gray, Nicolai Gumilov, Alan Gurganus, Brion Gysin, Donald Harrington, Hermann Hesse, Jack Hirschman, Susan Howe, Georges Hugnet, Victor Hugo, Aldous Huxley, Tama Janowitz, Charles Johnson, Donald Justice, Anna Kavan, Weldon Kees, Robert Kelly, Jack Kerouac, Maxine Hong Kingston, Bill Knott, Richard Kostelanetz, Alfred Kubin, D.H. Lawrence, Jonathan Lethem, Wyndham Lewis, Pierre Louys, Mina Loy, Lucebert, Clarence Major, Gerad Malanga, Andre Malraux, Robert Marshall, Henri Michaux, Leonard Michaels, Henri Michaux, Henry Miller, Susan Minot, Bradford Morrow, Walter Mosley, Vladimir Nabokov, Hugh Nissensen, Clifford Odets, Fernando del Paso, Kenneth Patchen, Mervyn Peake, Claude Pellieu, Francisco Picabia, Alexandra Pizarnik, Sylvia Plath, Beatrix Potter, Annie Proulx, James Purdy, Alexei Remizov, Kenneth Rexroth, Maclaren Ross, Peter Sacks, William Saroyan, Mira Schor, Maurice Sendak, Charles Simic, Patti Smith, William Jay Smith, Iris Smyles, Ralph Steadman, Mark Strand, Aldo Tembalini, Igor Terentiev, Cecilia Thaxter, Ruthven Todd, Frederic Tuten, Josef Vachal, Cecilia Vicuna, Tino Villanuevo, Kurt Vonnegut, Janwillwem van de Wetering, Derek Walcott, Keith Waldrop, Rosanna Warren, Lewis Warsh, Denton Welch, Marjorie Welish, Richard Wilbur, Tennessee Williams, Gahan Wilson, Stanislaw Witkiewicz and Unica Zuern (and a few others not all yet committed, if you can imagine that).

A catalogue will be made for the exhibition, with an introduction by the magnificent novelist Joseph McElroy.

Best wishes,

John Wronoski

Lame Duck Books
Pierre Menard Gallery
10-12 Arrow Street
Cambridge, MA  02138

December 20th, 2007 • Posted in Authors and Books

New Vintage Penguins Rule!

 

Just executed a comprehensive recce-browse of the fiction section at my local Chapters (big box/high street) book store, and was wowed once again by Penguins. New Vintage ones. Last time this happened it was the My Penguin blank bookcover contest, which showed striking ingenuity and marketing savvy…Low-tech, Youtube-style user-content for books. Design your own.

This time it’s creativity. Two covers in particular belittled all those sharing their shelves: Iris Murdoch’s The Sea, The Sea, and most arrestingly, Laura Lee’s Cider with Rosie. Too bad it doesn’t show up so well on the web here. Best visit your local bookstore for an up-close-and-personal peruse. Here’s a book worth buying just for its cover. What a great publisher. Penguin Rules! There’s even a video.

December 20th, 2007 • Posted in Authors and Books

New Guardian Book Blog Post

In today’s Guardian Books Blog you can find a post by me entitled Reading to Put You off Books:Too many academics have abandoned clarity and enthusiasm for cliquey obscurity

Most readers of lit crit would doubtless agree that clear, persuasive, interesting writing is key. Why then are academics so intent on obfuscation?…

December 19th, 2007 • Posted in Uncategorized

Flaubert’s Parrot: Bon Mots and Held Applause

This book is best described as charming. Less a novel, than a volume of light criticism, Flaubert’s Parrot takes a pleasant walk  through the paysage of Northern France and Gustave Flaubert’s mind. Can’t say I got much from it though. Awards and  inflated front-cover promises are in part to blame. They stoked an existing appetite for apt metaphors and profundities on literature and the human condition, and heightened anticipation of reading an untried highly regarded author. Julian Barnes‘ writing here is clever, but in the shadow of Flaubert’s, virtually invisible. The plot is like so much dough left over from the cookie cutter. Quotes worthy of mention are mostly Gustave’s; criticism is largely anecdotal. Given the hype, Barnes’s reputation and the topic, I expected a lot. Much like the case with Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam, I left the table hungry and slightly irritated.

Mounting a different metaphor: perhaps I went with the wrong horses. Maybe these weren’t bred to be the best. I wont leave the stables, but for now I’m holding my applause.

As an aperitif Flaubert’s Parrot will do, but for real sustenance, try the obvious, read Madame Bovary, then Francis Steegmuller’s Flaubert and Madame Bovary, then the mother lode, Flaubert’s Letters.

Here’s a soupçon of  bon mots from Flaubert’s Parrot:

Remember [Flaubert's] sad definition from Madame Bovary: ‘Language is like a cracked kettle on which we beat out tunes for bears to dance to, while all the time we long to move the stars to pity.’ So you can take the novelist either way: as a pertinacious and finished stylist; or as one who considers language tragically insufficient. Sartreans prefer the second option: for them Loulou’s {parrot} inability to do more than repeat at second hand the phrases he hears is an indirect confession of the novelist’s own failure. 

Perhaps this is the advantage of making friends with those already dead: your feelings toward them never cool.

Preference for the consolation of non-fulfilment over the desolation of uncompleted work: the planned visit to the brothel, the pleasure of anticipation, and then, years later, not the memory of deeds but the memory of past anticipations? Wouldn’t that keep it all cleaner and less painful?

Remember the botched brothel visit in L’Education sentimentale and remember its lesson. Do not participate: happiness lies in the imagination, not the act. Pleasure is found first in anticipation, later in memory. Such is the Flaubertian temperament.  

Comforting a sad and discouraged Louise [Colet], he reminds her that we are all caged birds, and that life weighs the heaviest on those with largest wings.

The greatest patriotism is to tell your country when it is behaving dishonourably, foolishly, viciously. The writer must be universal in sympathy and an outcast by nature: only then can he see clearly.  

The artist must manage to make posterity believe that he never existed.

Nabokov on adultery in his lecture on Madame Bovary: "a most conventional way to rise above the conventional."

Style arises from subject matter.

Flaubert would alter a fact for the sake of a cadence.

I’m saying that you trust the mystifier more if you know he’s deliberately choosing not to be lucid. You trust Picasso all the way because he could draw like Ingres.  

Flaubert with Montaigne teaches you to sleep on the pillow of doubt 

 Flaubert’s maxims for writing: Form isn’t an overcoat flung over the flesh of thought; it’s the flesh of thought itself. You can no more imagine an Idea without a Form than a Form without an idea…You must write according to your feelings, be sure those feelings are true, and let everything else go hang. When a line is good, it ceases to belong to any school. A line of prose must be as immutable as a line of poetry. If you happen to write well, you are accused of lacking ideas.

You are elected into love by a secret ballot against which there is no appeal.

When the chest is flat, one is nearer the heart.  

Books are where things are explained to you; life is where things aren’t.

 

 

Incoming search terms:

  • flaubert\s parrot analysis
  • flaubert\s parrot quote about the pleasure of anticipation
  • pleasure is found first in anticipation later in memory
December 18th, 2007 • Posted in Authors and Books

Ed Champion Refocuses


Ed Champion, here surrounded by admirers, has announced that he’ll be closing down his Return of the Reluctant blog to focus on novel writing, Bat Segundo author interviewing and other artistic endeavours. Ed’s blog was always interesting, crammed with links, and insight and gossip and laughs. I’ll miss it. And wish him well.

We met briefly last summer at BookExpo in New York; had hoped to interview each other for our respective shows, but the timing was off. Hopefully we’ll make it happen  sometime. Perhaps after he publishes blockbuster #1. Here are his parting words:

"For now, however, I’m done with blogging. And I’m serious this time.
There are pages of crazed dialogue to bang out. Stories and essays to
write. Podcasts to unfurl. Actors to recruit. A troubled protagonist to
flesh out, who I’ve been learning more about over the past year.

If you’re looking for new content in the meantime, well, you’ll find all that over at Segundo — including, very soon, that Will Self conversation that some of you have been asking about.

But thanks very much for helping to make Reluctant what it’s been over the past four years."

– Edward Champion

December 17th, 2007 • Posted in Uncategorized

Keats’s To Autumn is about…Autumn

 So, I’ve read the text closely and come to the conclusion that To Autumn is about…Autumn, transition, passage of time, the inevitability of change. It’s true that Keats supported political reform and Henry Hunt, that he was quite aware of the massacre at St. Peter’s Field near Manchester; and that he was in London when Hunt returned. “Somewhere,” as Aileen Ward puts it in her National Book Award winning biography, “ in the clapping, cheering, handkerchief-waving crowd Keats wandered, caught up in the surge of revolutionary ardour.” Several short pages beyond this quote Ward introduces To Autumn as Keats’ most perfect and untroubled poem. No mention of reform, Manchester, massacre or Hunt, and a direct contradiction of Paulin’s assertions of unsettlement,anxiety and discomfort. This, Ward says, is Keats’ most impersonal poem, he is
completely lost in his images, and “the images are presented as meaning simply themselves.” She does however quote Shelley’s Mask of Anarchy, stating that it was inspired by ‘Peterloo.’ In the five pages he devotes to To Autumn in his biography of Keats, Walter Jackson Bate, another authoritative scholar, makes no mention of reform or massacre, or unrest. He calls the poem “entirely concrete, and self sufficient in and through its concreteness.”

In his Guardian article Tom Paulin proves critic Dale Peck’s point about criticism’s trade secret: you can find meaning in anything if you look hard enough. The challenge is to argue persuasively in favour of that meaning. Paulin fails to do this.

Incoming search terms:

  • close reading of to autumn
December 16th, 2007 • Posted in Authors and Books

Crash Course in Foundation Texts

BBC Radio 3′s The Essay:Greek and Latin Voices,offers listeners an accessible modern guide to some of the foundation texts of Western culture. Each
week, in four lively 15 minute programs, scholars, writers and passionate
classicists, explore various aspects of these works and their authors. There’s also a look at how these great authors influenced contemporary ones.

Just listened to Barbara Graziosi talking about Homer, whose blindness supposedly enabled him a connection with the muse. Stay tuned for great music after each program.